CHON
From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-06.)
CHON has 68 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 6 references, with 9 live disagreements.
Mostly:has training time(5), has recall(3), has parameter count(3)
Maturity scale
raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certifiedInbound mentions (7)
Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.
advocatesForAdvocates for(1)
- Xenonfun
ex:xenonfun
affectsPerformanceOfAffects Performance of(1)
- Expanding Fault Window
ex:expanding-fault-window
areAlreadyGoodAre Already Good(1)
- Early Life Predictions
ex:early-life-predictions
assertsModelBehaviorAsserts Model Behavior(1)
- Xenonfun
ex:xenonfun
comparesModelsCompares Models(1)
- Formal Results Table
ex:formal-results-table
partOfPart of(1)
- Ema Detector
ex:ema-detector
usedForBenchmarkingUsed for Benchmarking(1)
- NASA Ims Bearing Dataset
ex:nasa-ims-bearing-dataset
Other facts (66)
The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.
| Predicate | Value | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Has Training Time | 0.1 second | [1] |
| Has Training Time | 0.1 | [2] |
| Has Training Time | 0.1 sec | [2] |
| Has Training Time | 0.1 second | [5] |
| Has Training Time | 0.1 | [6] |
| Has Recall | 100% | [1] |
| Has Recall | 1 | [2] |
| Has Recall | 100 | [6] |
| Has Parameter Count | 119 | [2] |
| Has Parameter Count | 116 | [5] |
| Has Parameter Count | 119 | [6] |
| Has Accuracy | 0.902 | [2] |
| Has Accuracy | 90.2% | [6] |
| Has Precision | 0.676 | [2] |
| Has Precision | 67.6 | [6] |
| Has Auroc Score | 0.985 | [2] |
| Has Auroc Score | 0.98 | [2] |
| Has F1 Score | 0.81 | [2] |
| Has F1 Score | 0.81 | [6] |
| Has Fewer Parameters Than | Best Published Lstm | [2] |
| Has Fewer Parameters Than | Lstm Autoencoder | [2] |
| Detects Earlier Than | Ground Truth Fault Window | [2] |
| Detects Earlier Than | Binary Label Fault Start | [5] |
| Rdf:type | Model | [4] |
| Rdf:type | Machine Learning Model | [6] |
| Achieves Recall | 100% | [1] |
| Achieves Auroc for Fault25 Percent | 0.989 | [1] |
| Achieves Auroc for Fault30 Percent | 0.98 | [1] |
| Achieves F1 | 0.826 | [1] |
| Achieves F1 for Fault25 Percent | 0.932 | [1] |
| Achieves F1 for Fault30 Percent | 0.993 | [1] |
| Achieves Near Perfect F1 | null | [1] |
| Achieves Precision | 70.4% | [1] |
| Achieves Precision for Fault25 Percent | 87.3% | [1] |
| Achieves Precision for Fault30 Percent | 98.7% | [1] |
| Achieves Recall for Fault25 Percent | 100% | [1] |
| Achieves Recall for Fault30 Percent | 100% | [1] |
| Beats Every | Published Baseline | [1] |
| Beats on F1 | Lstm Autoencoder | [1] |
| Achieves Auroc | 0.985 | [1] |
| Detects Degradation | Earlier Than Binary Label | [1] |
| Superior to Baselines | null | [1] |
| Detects Early Degradation | null | [1] |
| Has860 Times Fewer Parameters Than | Lstm Autoencoder | [1] |
| Has Auroc | 0.98 | [1] |
| Has F1 | 0.993 | [1] |
| Has Number of Parameters | 116 | [1] |
| Is Not Making | False Positives | [1] |
| Evaluated on | NASA Ims Bearing Dataset | [2] |
| Outperforms in Training Speed | Lstm Autoencoder | [2] |
| Matches Auroc of | Lstm Autoencoder | [2] |
| Is Ours | null | [2] |
| Claimed Superior in Efficiency | null | [2] |
| Has False Positives Count | 24 | [2] |
| Evaluated on Full Results | null | [3] |
| Test Status | unchanged | [4] |
| Has F1 Score at Fault30pct | 0.993 | [5] |
| Has Precision at Fault30pct | 98.7% | [5] |
| Has Recall at Fault30pct | 100% | [5] |
| Has Auroc at Fault30pct | 0.98 | [5] |
| Detects | Degradation | [5] |
| Outperforms | Published Baselines | [5] |
| Has Parameter Count Advantage Over | Lstm Autoencoder | [5] |
| Has Auroc | 0.985 | [6] |
| Measured in Dataset | NASA Ims Bearing Dataset | [6] |
| Has Owner | Our Team | [6] |
Timeline
Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.
References (6)
ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/part-509ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/part-508ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/part-515ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/501- full textwatt-activation-501text/plain2 KB
doc:agent/watt-activation-501/185a146d-ca90-4ea8-8412-733781e20533Show excerpt
[2026-03-22 19:35] xenonfun: ``` --- What We're NOT Porting (and Why) - Spatial Clifford convolutions (1D/2D/3D): We do sequence models, not spatial CNNs. Fourier convolution covers the spectral case. - PR #17 grouped conv fix: Only ap…
ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/506- full textwatt-activation-506text/plain2 KB
doc:agent/watt-activation-506/491a6927-81ff-44b4-967f-83424796e025Show excerpt
[2026-03-22 20:23] xenonfun: ⏺ Interesting — AUROC is identical at 0.985 across all group counts. The residual separability is already maxed out. The F1 differences come from threshold tuning, not the model itself. G=1 actually gives the …
ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/505- full textwatt-activation-505text/plain2 KB
doc:agent/watt-activation-505/942386e0-0cb8-490c-8592-6512fb5cc7cbShow excerpt
[2026-03-22 20:11] xenonfun: ``` ⏺ Formal results: ┌───────────────┬───────────────────┬──────────────────────────┐ │ Metric │ CHON (119 params) │ Best Published │ ├───────────────┼───────────────────┼───────────────…
See also
Keep researching
Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.