Current trained weights
From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-06.)
Current trained weights has 9 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 2 references.
Mostly:performs no better than chance(1), has percentage near ternary values after scaling(1), are not(1)
Maturity scale
raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certifiedOther facts (8)
The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.
| Predicate | Value | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Performs No Better Than Chance | Random Gaussian | [1] |
| Has Percentage Near Ternary Values After Scaling | ~46% | [1] |
| Are Not | Naturally Ternary | [1] |
| Presupposes Existence of | Lohe Model | [1] |
| Rdf:type | Model Parameter | [2] |
| Is Not Naturally Ternary | true | [2] |
| Performs Better Than Chance | false | [2] |
| Performance Compared to | Random Gaussian Baseline | [2] |
Timeline
Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.
References (2)
ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/part-277ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/275- full textwatt-activation-275text/plain3 KB
doc:agent/watt-activation-275/149bf24b-54fb-4412-b289-e2e03bccffe2Show excerpt
[2026-03-13 20:46] xenonfun: ⏺ This tells a clear story: Current trained weights are NOT naturally ternary. Only ~46% of values are near {-1, 0, 1} after scaling (random Gaussian would give ~47%, so no better than chance). Relative err…
See also
Keep researching
Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.