Dontopedia

Evaluate Intent Precision

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-11.)

Evaluate Intent Precision has 25 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 4 references, with 6 live disagreements.

25 facts·16 predicates·4 sources·6 in dispute

Mostly:rdf:type(4), returns(2), parameter(2)

Maturity scale raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certified

Inbound mentions (2)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

hasObjectiveHas Objective(1)

passedToPassed to(1)

Other facts (25)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

25 facts
PredicateValueRef
Rdf:typeFunction[1]
Rdf:typeFunction[2]
Rdf:typeEvaluation Task[3]
Rdf:typeFunction[4]
ReturnsPrecision[1]
ReturnsPrecision[4]
ParameterWeights[4]
ParameterTest Queries[4]
CallsApply Weights and Generate Query[4]
CallsCheck Intent Match[4]
ContainsFor Loop[4]
ContainsConditional Check[4]
Has VariableCorrect Count[4]
Has VariablePrecision[4]
Has Control StructureFor Loop[4]
Has Control StructureIf Statement[4]
Has ParameterWeights[1]
Placeholder Value0.9[1]
Purposeevaluate intent precision[1]
Implementation NoteReplace this with your actual evaluation logic[1]
Takes ParameterNormalized Weights[2]
Is Placeholdertrue[2]
Logiccorrect_count / len(test_queries)[4]
Contains CommentCheck if the reformulated query matches the expected intent[4]
Function Signaturedef evaluate_intent_precision(weights, test_queries):[4]

Timeline

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

typebeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
ex:Function
hasParameterbeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
ex:weights
returnsbeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
ex:precision
placeholderValuebeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
0.9
purposebeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
evaluate intent precision
implementationNotebeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
Replace this with your actual evaluation logic
typebeam/d307a23c-1866-4ea9-9a82-42827b961a77
ex:Function
takesParameterbeam/d307a23c-1866-4ea9-9a82-42827b961a77
ex:normalized-weights
isPlaceholderbeam/d307a23c-1866-4ea9-9a82-42827b961a77
true
typebeam/17359c4f-ce82-472f-b0cd-20671ade934f
ex:EvaluationTask
typebeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:Function
parameterbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:weights
parameterbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:test-queries
returnsbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:precision
logicbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
correct_count / len(test_queries)
callsbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:apply-weights-and-generate-query
callsbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:check-intent-match
containsbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:for-loop
containsbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:conditional-check
contains-commentbeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
Check if the reformulated query matches the expected intent
functionSignaturebeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
def evaluate_intent_precision(weights, test_queries):
hasVariablebeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:correct-count
hasVariablebeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:precision
hasControlStructurebeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:for-loop
hasControlStructurebeam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
ex:if-statement

References (4)

4 references
  1. ctx:claims/beam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
      Show excerpt
      For each combination of weights, evaluate the performance using your test queries and measure the intent precision. ### Example Implementation Here's an example of how you might structure your experiments: ```python import itertools impo
  2. ctx:claims/beam/d307a23c-1866-4ea9-9a82-42827b961a77
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/d307a23c-1866-4ea9-9a82-42827b961a77
      Show excerpt
      context_weights['system_state'] = combo[2] context_weights['external_data_sources'] = combo[3] # Ensure the sum of weights equals 1 total_weight = sum(context_weights.values()) normalized_weights = {k: v / total_wei
  3. ctx:claims/beam/17359c4f-ce82-472f-b0cd-20671ade934f
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/17359c4f-ce82-472f-b0cd-20671ade934f
      Show excerpt
      ``` Replace the placeholder functions with your actual logic to evaluate the intent precision. Would you like to proceed with these steps or do you have any specific questions about any part of the process? [Turn 10474] User: Sure, let's
  4. ctx:claims/beam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/11402421-e0dd-4257-81f5-18735667d931
      Show excerpt
      2. **Refine the Search**: If the initial search does not yield significant improvements, consider narrowing down the range or using more sophisticated optimization techniques. 3. **Validate Results**: Validate the results on a separate vali

See also

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.