Evaluate Reformulations Function
From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-11.)
Evaluate Reformulations Function has 4 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 1 reference, with 1 live disagreement.
Maturity scale
raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certifiedInbound mentions (1)
Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.
demonstratesDemonstrates(1)
- Code Example
ex:code-example
Other facts (4)
The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.
| Predicate | Value | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Has Parameter | original_queries | [1] |
| Has Parameter | reformulated_queries | [1] |
| Rdf:type | Python Function | [1] |
| Returns | average-bleu-score | [1] |
Timeline
Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.
References (1)
ctx:claims/beam/97ef0996-2bbf-4217-af6b-6a0f7a933ea0- full textbeam-chunktext/plain1 KB
doc:beam/97ef0996-2bbf-4217-af6b-6a0f7a933ea0Show excerpt
eval_dataset=eval_dataset, ) trainer.train() ``` ### Evaluation Metrics To evaluate the quality of reformulated queries, you can use metrics like BLEU or ROUGE: ```python from nltk.translate.bleu_score import sentence_bleu def eval…
See also
Keep researching
Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.