Dontopedia

Expected Terms Variable

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-10.)

Expected Terms Variable has 2 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 1 reference.

2 facts·2 predicates·1 sources
Maturity scale raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certified

Inbound mentions (1)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

containsContains(1)

Other facts (2)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

2 facts
PredicateValueRef
Has Value["happy","joyful"][1]
Is Argument forEvaluate Relevance Function[1]

Timeline

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

hasValuebeam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
["happy","joyful"]
isArgumentForbeam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
ex:evaluate_relevance-function

References (1)

1 references
  1. ctx:claims/beam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
      Show excerpt
      expected_terms = ["happy", "joyful"] precision = evaluate_relevance(expanded_terms, expected_terms) print(f"Precision: {precision}") ``` I'm looking for ways to improve the evaluation strategy to measure the accuracy of the algorithm. Can s

See also

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.