Future Consideration

as donto believed on

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-06.)

Future Consideration has 2 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 1 reference.

2 facts·2 predicates·1 sources

Inbound mentions (2)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

`mustFormSubjectOf`Must Form Subject of(2)

Council Commission Enlargementex:council-commission-enlargement
Enlargement of Scope and Powersex:enlargement-of-scope-and-powers

Other facts (2)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

2 facts

Predicate	Value	Ref
Action	look into proper val evaluation	[1]
Reason	think most of lisa's experiments were doing that corrrectly	[1]

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

2 undated

—

actionblah/watt-activation/41

look into proper val evaluation

—

reasonblah/watt-activation/41

think most of lisa's experiments were doing that corrrectly

References (1)

1 references

[1]412 facts
ctx:discord/blah/watt-activation/41
- full textwatt-activation-41
  text/plain2 KBdoc:agent/watt-activation-41/72feaad1-da4d-405f-9a39-dc01405b6065
  Show excerpt
  [2026-03-07 04:39] xenonfun: ### Validation Perplexity: The gold standard for "best" tracking is eval loss on a held-out set — data the model never trains on. You periodically pause, run the model over the val set with no gradient upda…

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.