really screwed up method arg mismatch
From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-07-02.)
really screwed up method arg mismatch has 3 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 2 references.
Maturity scale
raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certifiedInbound mentions (4)
Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.
contributedToContributed to(1)
- Compilation Failure
ex:compilation-failure
hadIssuesHad Issues(1)
- Code
ex:code
preventedCompilationDueToPrevented Compilation Due to(1)
- Code
ex:code
rdf:typeRdf:type(1)
- Code Issue
ex:code-issue
Other facts (2)
The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.
| Predicate | Value | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Severely Screwed Up | {} | [1] |
| Has Problem | Code Issue | [2] |
Timeline
Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.
References (2)
ctx:discord/blah/safiersemantics/part-39ctx:claims/document/027975c8-a7c2-4d3b-a192-7b6eb997b1f3- full textxenonfun: the anwser is correct shapes, had basic missing imports and one really screwed utext/plain163 B
discord:msg/92487a0f-26cf-488b-b0fd-925fe40c040dShow excerpt
the anwser is correct shapes, had basic missing imports and one really screwed up method arg mismatch so never compiled, not sure how we even considered this done.…
See also
Keep researching
Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.