Mr a Feez

as donto believed on

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-05-05.)

Mr a Feez

Asked If	"I will make the ------sit up for saying that?"^[1]
Asked If	going to marry you^[1]
Of Firm	Macpherson and Feez^[2]
Was Passenger on	Keilawarra Ship^[4]
Accuses of Effrontery	People Suggesting Withdrawal^[1]
Asks Judge	what the rest of the jurors were to do^[1]
Asserts Different Occasions	the occasions mentioned were two different occasions altogether^[1]
Asserts Duty to Examine Letter	duty of the other side to have looked at the letter and seen whose writing it was^[1]
Asserts Jury No Doubt	jury could have no doubt... proved by undeniable evidence^[1]

ex:mr-a-feez

Mr a Feez has 69 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 4 references, with 1 live disagreement.

69 facts·68 predicates·4 sources·1 in dispute

Mostly:asked if(2), of firm(1), was passenger on(1)

Asked Ifin dispute`askedIf`

"I will make the ------sit up for saying that?"^[1]all time · North Shore Full
going to marry you^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Of Firm`ofFirm`

Macpherson and Feez^[2]all time · 3541960 Tuesday 17 May 1892 to Day May 17

Was Passenger on`wasPassengerOn`

Keilawarra Ship^[4]all time · 19779477 Saturday 8 March 1879 Shipping Intelligence Arrivals

Accuses of Effrontery`accusesOfEffrontery`

People Suggesting Withdrawal^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Asks Judge`asksJudge`

what the rest of the jurors were to do^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Asserts Different Occasions`assertsDifferentOccasions`

the occasions mentioned were two different occasions altogether^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Asserts Duty to Examine Letter`assertsDutyToExamineLetter`

duty of the other side to have looked at the letter and seen whose writing it was^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Asserts Jury No Doubt`assertsJuryNoDoubt`

jury could have no doubt... proved by undeniable evidence^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Assisted by`assistedBy`

Mr F O Rourke^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Avoids Doubtful Evidence`avoidsDoubtfulEvidence`

did not want to deal with any evidence that had any shadow of doubt^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Brief Prepared Before Interrogatories`briefPreparedBeforeInterrogatories`

brief was prepared before he received the interrogatories^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Continues Address to Jury`continuesAddressToJury`

Jury^[1]all time · North Shore Full

Inbound mentions (4)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

`carriedPassenger`Carried Passenger(2)

Elamangex:elamang
Kemblawarra Shipex:kemblawarra-ship

`assisted`Assisted(1)

Mr F O'rourkeex:mr-f-o'rourke

`defendantsRepresentedBy`Defendants Represented by(1)

Emmett V Queensland Mercantile Companyex:emmett-v-queensland-mercantile-company

Other facts (56)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

56 facts

Predicate	Value	Ref
Draws Conclusion of Immoral Conduct	Edith Ross and Philip James Symes Immoral	[1]
Expresses Indifference	It is a matter of perfect indifference to me	[1]
Instructs Jury Ignore Burns	did not want the jury to take any notice whatever of Burns's evidence	[1]
Interprets As Extraordinary Conduct	Mrs Ross Night Outings	[1]
Objects to Interruptions	Continual Interruptions by Lukin and Stumm	[1]
Points Out Incident	Mrs Ross Driving at 4 30am	[1]
Questions Necessity If Mild Flirtation	if such a mild flirtation, what necessity of sending type-written envelopes	[1]
Questions Why Not Walk Together	why could they not have walked away together	[1]
Refuses to Withdraw	Phaeton Incident	[1]
Rejects Scouring Gutters	not the duty... to scour the gutters to rake up charges	[1]
Represents	William Donald Ross	[1]
Responds About Burns	would also say something about Burns	[1]
Summarizes Case Dealt With	Allegations of Adultery	[1]
Withdraws Burns Evidence	withdraw his evidence altogether	[1]
Would Not Call If Known Bad Character	Burns	[1]
Accused of	turned Queen's evidence and sneaked	[1]
Accused of Drinking This Morning	few in you this morning	[1]
Accused of Saying	"I am in trouble; give me a couple of quid!"	[1]
Accused Told Mr Pattison	knew nothing about case	[1]
Aggressive Cross Examination Style	evident	[1]
Agreed Believes Wish Not Here	quite believe you do	[1]
Asked About Sentences	one woman 12 months, another 2 years	[1]
Asked for Names	names of people there	[1]
Asked Getting Anything for Evidence	true	[1]
Asked If Arrested for	child murder	[1]
Asked If Asked for Money	anything	[1]
Asked If Man Who	went north with you and lived with you	[1]
Asked If Ross Took to Pattison	true	[1]
Asked If Told Could Give No Evidence	true	[1]
Asked If Told Pattison Knew Nothing	true	[1]
Asked If Told Pattison Never Drove to Ill Fame	true	[1]
Asked If Went to Ross Told Knew Nothing	true	[1]
Asked Seen Police Records	movements of registered women	[1]
Asked Told What Record Said	true	[1]
Called Witness	unmitigated liar	[1]
Commented on Accuracy	most remarkably accurate	[1]
Criticized Date Range	1890-1898 very safe dates	[1]
Cross Examined Bretherton	Rachel Bretherton	[1]
Explained Queen Evidence As	person connected with crime gives evidence for Crown instead of prosecuted	[1]
Instructed by	Mr J Pattison	[1]
Instructed to Write Names	write on paper	[1]
Lawyer for	William Donald Ross	[1]
No Questions for Mclean	true	[1]
Pointed Contradiction	trying to have them when said never drove	[1]
Presented Document	Loosemore Affidavit 1891	[1]
Presented Records	have the records here	[1]
Reasoned Withdrawal As	might expose people here now	[1]
Requested Write Name of	Rockhampton person who called Ross Rorty	[1]
Sarcastic Pure Love of Truth	doing out of pure love of truth	[1]
Sarcastic Would Not Take It	would not take it would you?	[1]
Withdrew Name Request	no never mind	[1]
Promotes	Drag Hunt Club	[3]
Contradicts With Reality	really... if Ross had found out he would have given Symes a jolly good hiding	[1]
Interprets As Haunting	Symes Haunting Mrs Ross	[1]
Interprets As Refusal to Answer	Defendant and Co Defendant Refusal	[1]
Suggests Honest Answer Would Be	Yes. It is Mr. Symes's writing, and it was written under these circumstances.	[1]

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

69 undated

—

accusedOftrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

turned Queen's evidence and sneaked

—

accusedOfDrinkingThisMorningtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

few in you this morning

—

accusedOfSayingtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

"I am in trouble; give me a couple of quid!"

—

accusedToldMrPattisontrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

knew nothing about case

—

accusesOfEffronterytrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:people-suggesting-withdrawal

—

aggressiveCrossExaminationStyletrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

evident

—

agreedBelievesWishNotHeretrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

quite believe you do

—

askedAboutSentencestrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

one woman 12 months, another 2 years

—

askedForNamestrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

names of people there

—

askedGettingAnythingForEvidencetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

askedIftrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

"I will make the ------sit up for saying that?"

—

askedIftrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

going to marry you

—

askedIfArrestedFortrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

child murder

—

askedIfAskedForMoneytrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

anything

—

askedIfManWhotrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

went north with you and lived with you

—

askedIfRossTookToPattisontrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

askedIfToldCouldGiveNoEvidencetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

askedIfToldPattisonKnewNothingtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

askedIfToldPattisonNeverDroveToIllFametrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

askedIfWentToRossToldKnewNothingtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

askedSeenPoliceRecordstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

movements of registered women

—

askedToldWhatRecordSaidtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

asksJudgetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

what the rest of the jurors were to do

—

assertsDifferentOccasionstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

the occasions mentioned were two different occasions altogether

—

assertsDutyToExamineLettertrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

duty of the other side to have looked at the letter and seen whose writing it was

—

assertsJuryNoDoubttrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

jury could have no doubt... proved by undeniable evidence

—

assistedBytrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:mr-f-o-rourke

—

avoidsDoubtfulEvidencetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

did not want to deal with any evidence that had any shadow of doubt

—

briefPreparedBeforeInterrogatoriestrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

brief was prepared before he received the interrogatories

—

calledWitnesstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

unmitigated liar

—

commentedOnAccuracytrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

most remarkably accurate

—

continuesAddressToJurytrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:jury

—

contradictsWithRealitytrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

really... if Ross had found out he would have given Symes a jolly good hiding

—

criticizedDateRangetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

1890-1898 very safe dates

—

crossExaminedBrethertontrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:rachel-bretherton

—

drawsConclusionOfImmoralConducttrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:edith-ross-and-philip-james-symes-immoral

—

explainedQueenEvidenceAstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

person connected with crime gives evidence for Crown instead of prosecuted

—

expressesIndifferencetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

It is a matter of perfect indifference to me

—

instructedBytrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:mr-j-pattison

—

instructedToWriteNamestrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

write on paper

—

instructsJuryIgnoreBurnstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

did not want the jury to take any notice whatever of Burns's evidence

—

interpretsAsExtraordinaryConducttrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:mrs-ross-night-outings

—

interpretsAsHauntingtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:symes-haunting-mrs-ross

—

interpretsAsRefusalToAnswertrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:defendant-and-co-defendant-refusal

—

lawyerFortrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:william-donald-ross

—

noQuestionsForMcleantrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

true

—

objectsToInterruptionstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:continual-interruptions-by-lukin-and-stumm

—

ofFirmbrackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/3541960_Tuesday-17-May-1892-to-day-may-17

ex:macpherson-and-feez

—

pointedContradictiontrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

trying to have them when said never drove

—

pointsOutIncidenttrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:mrs-ross-driving-at-4-30am

—

presentedDocumenttrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:loosemore-affidavit-1891

—

presentedRecordstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

have the records here

—

promotestrove-cooktown/john-davis

ex:drag-hunt-club

—

questionsNecessityIfMildFlirtationtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

if such a mild flirtation, what necessity of sending type-written envelopes

—

questionsWhyNotWalkTogethertrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

why could they not have walked away together

—

reasonedWithdrawalAstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

might expose people here now

—

refusesToWithdrawtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:phaeton-incident

—

rejectsScouringGutterstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

not the duty... to scour the gutters to rake up charges

—

representstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:william-donald-ross

—

requestedWriteNameOftrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

Rockhampton person who called Ross Rorty

—

respondsAboutBurnstrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

would also say something about Burns

—

sarcasticPureLoveOfTruthtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

doing out of pure love of truth

—

sarcasticWouldNotTakeIttrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

would not take it would you?

—

suggestsHonestAnswerWouldBetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

Yes. It is Mr. Symes's writing, and it was written under these circumstances.

—

summarizesCaseDealtWithtrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:allegations-of-adultery

—

wasPassengerOnbrackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/19779477_Saturday-8-March-1879-shipping-intelligence-arrivals

ex:keilawarra-ship

—

withdrawsBurnsEvidencetrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

withdraw his evidence altogether

—

withdrewNameRequesttrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

no never mind

—

wouldNotCallIfKnownBadCharactertrove-cooktown/north-shore-full

ex:burns

References (4)

4 references

[1]North Shore Full66 facts
customctx:genes/trove-cooktown/north-shore-full
[2]3541960 Tuesday 17 May 1892 to Day May 171 fact
customctx:genes/brackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/3541960_Tuesday-17-May-1892-to-day-may-17
[3]John Davis1 fact
customctx:genes/trove-cooktown/john-davis
[4]19779477 Saturday 8 March 1879 Shipping Intelligence Arrivals1 fact
customctx:genes/brackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/19779477_Saturday-8-March-1879-shipping-intelligence-arrivals

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.

Mr a Feez

Asked Ifin disputeaskedIf

Of FirmofFirm

Was Passenger onwasPassengerOn

Accuses of EffronteryaccusesOfEffrontery

Asks JudgeasksJudge

Asserts Different OccasionsassertsDifferentOccasions

Asserts Duty to Examine LetterassertsDutyToExamineLetter

Asserts Jury No DoubtassertsJuryNoDoubt

Assisted byassistedBy

Avoids Doubtful EvidenceavoidsDoubtfulEvidence

Brief Prepared Before InterrogatoriesbriefPreparedBeforeInterrogatories

Continues Address to JurycontinuesAddressToJury

Inbound mentions (4)

carriedPassengerCarried Passenger(2)

assistedAssisted(1)

defendantsRepresentedByDefendants Represented by(1)

Other facts (56)

Timeline

References (4)

See also

Keep researching

Asked Ifin dispute`askedIf`

Of Firm`ofFirm`

Was Passenger on`wasPassengerOn`

Accuses of Effrontery`accusesOfEffrontery`

Asks Judge`asksJudge`

Asserts Different Occasions`assertsDifferentOccasions`

Asserts Duty to Examine Letter`assertsDutyToExamineLetter`

Asserts Jury No Doubt`assertsJuryNoDoubt`

Assisted by`assistedBy`

Avoids Doubtful Evidence`avoidsDoubtfulEvidence`

Brief Prepared Before Interrogatories`briefPreparedBeforeInterrogatories`

Continues Address to Jury`continuesAddressToJury`

`carriedPassenger`Carried Passenger(2)

`assisted`Assisted(1)

`defendantsRepresentedBy`Defendants Represented by(1)