Dontopedia

Mr Rose

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-05-06.)

Mr Rose has 36 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 5 references.

36 facts·35 predicates·5 sources

Mostly:appeared for(2), affiliated with(1), lamented no witnesses for accused(1)

Maturity scale raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certified

Inbound mentions (13)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

authoredByAuthored by(1)

carriedMisterCarried Mister(1)

crossExaminedByCross Examined by(1)

namedByPersonNamed by Person(1)

objectedByObjected by(1)

onDetailsOn Details(1)

ownerOwner(1)

presupposesRegulatoryFrameworkPresupposes Regulatory Framework(1)

repeatedClaimsOfRepeated Claims of(1)

requestedConsultationWithRequested Consultation With(1)

resultedInElectionOfResulted in Election of(1)

secondedBySeconded by(1)

spokeInAbsenceOfSpoke in Absence of(1)

Other facts (36)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

36 facts
PredicateValueRef
Appeared forNeils Sorrenson[4]
Appeared forNeils Sorrenson[3]
Affiliated WithKilkivan Station[1]
Lamented No Witnesses for Accusednull[2]
Blamed Accused for Bringing Witnessesnull[2]
Remarked Witness Denialsnull[2]
Remarked Crown Wealthnull[2]
Questioned Leslienull[2]
Challenges Prosecution FoundationProsecution Case[2]
Contrasted With High SeasRiver Seine[2]
Cross Examines on LanguageCharles Leslie[2]
Prefers Best Evidenceelementary axiom[2]
Insists Strict Evidence Rulesaccording to rules[2]
Emphasizes TerritorialityAdmiralty Group[2]
Performs SecondFirst Motion[2]
Advocated Jurisdiction DefensePortuguese Ship[3]
Called Decisioncurious[3]
Citedimaginary cases and precedents[3]
Objected toLeslie Testimony[3]
Applied forBail[3]
Emphasized Ship NationalityDouro Ship[3]
Cross ExaminedSvend Laland[3]
Accused Witness of FraudSo you lent yourself as a party to a fraud?[3]
Advocated Fraud InterpretationThomas Gray Actions[3]
Initiated ArgumentNationality Argument[3]
Objected to QuestionIs the Douro a British vessel?[3]
Performed Speech Act of ObjectionQuestion Is Douro British[3]
Raised Argument Aboutnationality[3]
Argued Not British Ship{}[3]
Hedged Argument Pertinently{}[3]
Asked to Reserve Points{}[3]
Submitted No Case to Jury{}[3]
Raised Point on Section267 Merchant Shipping Act1854{}[3]
Made Submission No Case{}[3]
Argued Offence by Foreigner in Foreign Waters{}[3]
Member ofBoard of Inquiry[5]

Timeline

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

36 undated
—
affiliatedWithtrove-cooktown/cingalese
ex:kilkivan-station
—
lamentedNoWitnessesForAccusedtrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
null
—
blamedAccusedForBringingWitnessestrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
null
—
remarkedWitnessDenialstrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
null
—
remarkedCrownWealthtrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
null
—
questionedLeslietrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
null
—
challengesProsecutionFoundationtrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
ex:prosecution-case
—
contrastedWithHighSeastrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
ex:river-seine
—
crossExaminesOnLanguagetrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
ex:charles-leslie
—
prefersBestEvidencetrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
elementary axiom
—
insistsStrictEvidenceRulestrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
according to rules
—
emphasizesTerritorialitytrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
ex:admiralty-group
—
performsSecondtrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
ex:first-motion
—
advocatedJurisdictionDefensetrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:portuguese-ship
—
calledDecisiontrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
curious
—
citedtrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
imaginary cases and precedents
—
objectedTotrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:leslie-testimony
—
appliedFortrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:bail
—
emphasizedShipNationalitytrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:douro-ship
—
appearedFortrove-cooktown/aboriginal-bdm-crew
ex:neils-sorrenson
—
crossExaminedtrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:svend-laland
—
accusedWitnessOfFraudtrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
So you lent yourself as a party to a fraud?
—
advocatedFraudInterpretationtrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:thomas-gray-actions
—
appearedFortrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:neils-sorrenson
—
initiatedArgumenttrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:nationality-argument
—
objectedToQuestiontrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
Is the Douro a British vessel?
—
performedSpeechActOfObjectiontrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
ex:question-is-douro-british
—
raisedArgumentAbouttrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
nationality
—
arguedNotBritishShiptrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
{}
—
hedgedArgumentPertinentlytrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
{}
—
askedToReservePointstrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
{}
—
submittedNoCaseToJurytrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
{}
—
raisedPointOnSection267MerchantShippingAct1854trove-cooktown/douro-vessel
{}
—
madeSubmissionNoCasetrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
{}
—
arguedOffenceByForeignerInForeignWaterstrove-cooktown/douro-vessel
{}
—
memberOfbrackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/146784669_Tuesday-11-October-1887_No-title
ex:board-of-inquiry

References (5)

5 references
  1. [1]Cingalese1 fact
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/cingalese
  2. [2]Beche De Mer12 facts
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
  3. [3]Douro Vessel21 facts
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/douro-vessel
  4. [4]Aboriginal Bdm Crew1 fact
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/aboriginal-bdm-crew
  5. [5]146784669 Tuesday 11 October 1887 No Title1 fact
    ctx:genes/brackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/146784669_Tuesday-11-October-1887_No-title

See also

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.

↑