Dontopedia

OpenRefine

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-07.)

OpenRefine has 19 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 7 references, with 2 live disagreements.

19 facts·8 predicates·7 sources·2 in dispute

Mostly:rdf:type(7), used for(2), is evaluated by(1)

Maturity scale raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certified

Inbound mentions (12)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

iteratesOverIterates Over(2)

appliesToApplies to(1)

comparedToCompared to(1)

comparesCompares(1)

evaluatesEvaluates(1)

isCleanedByIs Cleaned by(1)

isOutputOfIs Output of(1)

isPurposeOfIs Purpose of(1)

targetSystemTarget System(1)

toolTool(1)

usesToolUses Tool(1)

Other facts (15)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

15 facts
PredicateValueRef
Rdf:typeData Cleaning Tool[1]
Rdf:typeData Cleaning Software[1]
Rdf:typeSoftware[2]
Rdf:typeData Cleaning Tool[3]
Rdf:typeSoftware Tool[4]
Rdf:typeTool[6]
Rdf:typeSoftware Tool[7]
Used forMetadata Cleaning[1]
Used fordata cleaning[7]
Is Evaluated bySuccess Rate Metric[1]
Version3.7.0[2]
Used forMetadata Cleaning[5]
Compared WithManual Cleaning[5]
Is Subject ofEvaluation Guide[5]
Compared toManual Cleaning[7]

Timeline

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

typebeam/e06228ca-08d1-403f-af94-242c605c308e
ex:DataCleaningTool
usedForbeam/e06228ca-08d1-403f-af94-242c605c308e
ex:metadata-cleaning
isEvaluatedBybeam/e06228ca-08d1-403f-af94-242c605c308e
ex:success-rate-metric
typebeam/e06228ca-08d1-403f-af94-242c605c308e
ex:DataCleaningSoftware
typebeam/4bf72c19-e147-4c83-b922-030035464495
ex:Software
labelbeam/4bf72c19-e147-4c83-b922-030035464495
OpenRefine
versionbeam/4bf72c19-e147-4c83-b922-030035464495
3.7.0
typebeam/f971d9d3-7050-4d32-844b-58db9f4972d7
ex:DataCleaningTool
typebeam/b00c301c-c592-4cd6-ad07-b1de426fb5c4
ex:SoftwareTool
used-forbeam/336f50f5-6e67-42bf-b2f1-406aa219718e
ex:metadata-cleaning
labelbeam/336f50f5-6e67-42bf-b2f1-406aa219718e
OpenRefine
compared-withbeam/336f50f5-6e67-42bf-b2f1-406aa219718e
ex:manual-cleaning
is-subject-ofbeam/336f50f5-6e67-42bf-b2f1-406aa219718e
ex:evaluation-guide
typebeam/abbe86bc-57a3-4347-aab0-645abb0507b7
ex:Tool
labelbeam/abbe86bc-57a3-4347-aab0-645abb0507b7
OpenRefine
typebeam/39688d70-2fa0-464e-b4cb-b00c300076b1
ex:SoftwareTool
labelbeam/39688d70-2fa0-464e-b4cb-b00c300076b1
OpenRefine
usedForbeam/39688d70-2fa0-464e-b4cb-b00c300076b1
data cleaning
comparedTobeam/39688d70-2fa0-464e-b4cb-b00c300076b1
ex:manual-cleaning

References (7)

7 references
  1. ctx:claims/beam/e06228ca-08d1-403f-af94-242c605c308e
  2. ctx:claims/beam/4bf72c19-e147-4c83-b922-030035464495
  3. ctx:claims/beam/f971d9d3-7050-4d32-844b-58db9f4972d7
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/f971d9d3-7050-4d32-844b-58db9f4972d7
      Show excerpt
      Manually clean the dataset to create a reference for comparison. This step involves fixing the inconsistencies introduced in the previous step. ```python # Manually clean the dataset df_cleaned = df.copy() # Replace 'Unknown' names with o
  4. ctx:claims/beam/b00c301c-c592-4cd6-ad07-b1de426fb5c4
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain970 Bdoc:beam/b00c301c-c592-4cd6-ad07-b1de426fb5c4
      Show excerpt
      This approach should help you identify the most common date formats in your dataset and pinpoint the root cause of the inconsistencies. [Turn 4500] User: I want to evaluate the performance of OpenRefine in cleaning metadata. Can you help m
  5. ctx:claims/beam/336f50f5-6e67-42bf-b2f1-406aa219718e
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/336f50f5-6e67-42bf-b2f1-406aa219718e
      Show excerpt
      [Turn 4501] Assistant: Certainly! To evaluate the performance of OpenRefine in cleaning metadata, you can generate a test dataset with various inconsistencies and then compare the results of OpenRefine's cleaning against a manually cleaned
  6. ctx:claims/beam/abbe86bc-57a3-4347-aab0-645abb0507b7
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/abbe86bc-57a3-4347-aab0-645abb0507b7
      Show excerpt
      # Define a function to compare the two datasets def compare_cleaning(openrefine, manual): # Calculate the number of matching entries matches = 0 for index, row in openrefine.iterrows(): if row.equals(manual.loc[index]):
  7. ctx:claims/beam/39688d70-2fa0-464e-b4cb-b00c300076b1
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/39688d70-2fa0-464e-b4cb-b00c300076b1
      Show excerpt
      1. **Generate Test Dataset**: Run the first script to generate the test dataset and save it to `test_dataset.csv`. 2. **Manually Clean Dataset**: Run the second script to manually clean the dataset and save it to `manually_cleaned_dataset.c

See also

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.