Opium Bill
From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-05-06.)
Opium Bill has 31 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 9 references, with 2 live disagreements.
Mostly:second reading negatived(3), defeated by vote(2), debate resumed on second reading(2)
Maturity scale
raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certifiedInbound mentions (12)
Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.
notedDivisionOfOpinionOnNoted Division of Opinion on(2)
- Mr Macansh
ex:mr-macansh - Mr Macansh
ex:mr-macansh
expressedSkepticismOnRevenueImpactExpressed Skepticism on Revenue Impact(1)
- Mr Macansh
ex:mr-macansh
partOfPart of(1)
- Portion Prohibiting Sale to Aboriginals
ex:portion-prohibiting-sale-to-aboriginals
presupposesExistenceOfPresupposes Existence of(1)
- Text
ex:text
questionedGainFromRevenueSacrificeQuestioned Gain From Revenue Sacrifice(1)
- Mr Macansh
ex:mr-macansh
refersToRefers to(1)
- Another Blow at Chinese
ex:another-blow-at-chinese
resumedDebateOnSecondReadingOfResumed Debate on Second Reading of(1)
- Legislative Council
ex:legislative-council
statedBillStopsOpiumSaleExceptMedicinalStated Bill Stops Opium Sale Except Medicinal(1)
- Mr Macansh
ex:mr-macansh
statedBillWontAffectChineseStated Bill Wont Affect Chinese(1)
- Mr Macansh
ex:mr-macansh
statedDivisionOfOpinionOnStated Division of Opinion on(1)
- Mr Macvnsii
ex:mr-macvnsii
statedDivisionOfOpinionOnBillStated Division of Opinion on Bill(1)
- Mr Macansh
ex:mr-macansh
Other facts (31)
The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.
| Predicate | Value | Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Second Reading Negatived | Legislative Council | [5] |
| Second Reading Negatived | Legislative Council | [6] |
| Second Reading Negatived | Legislative Council | [8] |
| Defeated by Vote | 12 to 10 | [4] |
| Defeated by Vote | 12 to 10 | [8] |
| Debate Resumed on Second Reading | Legislative Council | [6] |
| Debate Resumed on Second Reading | Legislative Council | [8] |
| Defeated by | Division Vote 12 10 | [6] |
| Defeated by | 12 | [8] |
| Debate on Second Reading Resumed | null | [7] |
| Debate on Second Reading Resumed | Legislative Council | [7] |
| Considered in Committee When | Fire Alarm in Chamber | [1] |
| Negatived on Second Reading | 12 to 11 | [2] |
| Presupposes Revenue Impact Debate | null | [3] |
| Stops Sale Except | medicinal purposes | [3] |
| Debate Resumed on | second reading | [3] |
| Second Reading Negatived by Division in | Queensland Legislative Council | [4] |
| Expected to Pass | Second Reading | [6] |
| Surprised by Rejection | Legislative Council | [6] |
| Would Entirely Stop Sale Except | medicinal purposes | [6] |
| Creates Revenue Loss Estimated at | £20,000 | [6] |
| Opinion That It Will Not Affect | Chinese | [6] |
| Targets Non Medicinal Sale | Chinese Consumers | [6] |
| Defeated by Votes | 12 to 10 | [6] |
| Targets Chinese Opium Sale | null | [7] |
| Would Cause Loss to | 20000 | [7] |
| Supported by | 10 | [8] |
| Faced Division Vote | null | [8] |
| Causes Revenue Loss of | 20000 | [8] |
| Presupposes Medicinal Use Legitimate | Opium | [8] |
| Presupposes Opium Smoking As Vice | Mr Brentnall | [9] |
Timeline
Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.
References (9)
ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/john-davisctx:genes/trove-cooktown/prostitutionctx:genes/laura-corridor/loop6-roth-ethnographyctx:genes/laura-corridor/loop9-aboriginal-womenctx:genes/laura-corridor/loop10-goldfield-townsctx:genes/laura-corridor/loop12-annan-cape-bedfordctx:genes/laura-corridor/loop14-children-takenctx:genes/laura-corridor/loop16-native-police-officersctx:genes/rosie-reynolds-massacre-connection/trove-nla-news-article4488244
See also
Keep researching
Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.