Dontopedia

precision

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-11.)

precision has 12 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 4 references, with 2 live disagreements.

12 facts·8 predicates·4 sources·2 in dispute

Mostly:rdf:type(3), takes arguments(2), variable name(1)

Maturity scale raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certified

Inbound mentions (7)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

addsToAdds to(1)

appendsAppends(1)

assignsAssigns(1)

containsContains(1)

dependsOnDepends on(1)

outputsOutputs(1)

producesProduces(1)

Other facts (11)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

11 facts
PredicateValueRef
Rdf:typeVariable[1]
Rdf:typeVariable[2]
Rdf:typeVariable[4]
Takes ArgumentsExpanded Terms[3]
Takes ArgumentsExpected Terms[3]
Variable Nameprecision[1]
Calculated FromPrecision Score Func[1]
Initialized to0[2]
Computed byEvaluate Relevance Function[3]
Is Output byPrint Statement[3]
Assigned byNumpy Random Uniform[4]

Timeline

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

typebeam/23c0eddb-0929-4239-8d55-13531af3e8f5
ex:Variable
variableNamebeam/23c0eddb-0929-4239-8d55-13531af3e8f5
precision
calculatedFrombeam/23c0eddb-0929-4239-8d55-13531af3e8f5
ex:precision-score-func
typebeam/96cf4ca7-4a68-4d51-ac51-83df213219c5
ex:Variable
labelbeam/96cf4ca7-4a68-4d51-ac51-83df213219c5
precision
initializedTobeam/96cf4ca7-4a68-4d51-ac51-83df213219c5
0
computedBybeam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
ex:evaluate_relevance-function
takesArgumentsbeam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
ex:expanded-terms
takesArgumentsbeam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
ex:expected-terms
isOutputBybeam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
ex:print-statement
typebeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
ex:Variable
assignedBybeam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
ex:numpy-random-uniform

References (4)

4 references
  1. ctx:claims/beam/23c0eddb-0929-4239-8d55-13531af3e8f5
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/23c0eddb-0929-4239-8d55-13531af3e8f5
      Show excerpt
      - **Average Precision (AP)**: Measure of precision at each relevant document. 4. **Mean Scores**: Calculate the mean of each metric across all queries. ### Additional Metrics 1. **Precision@k**: Precision of the top-k retrieved documen
  2. ctx:claims/beam/96cf4ca7-4a68-4d51-ac51-83df213219c5
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/96cf4ca7-4a68-4d51-ac51-83df213219c5
      Show excerpt
      - **Improved Performance**: Managing the stack manually can be more efficient, especially for large inputs. ### Example Usage When you run the code with a test term, it will expand the synonyms iteratively and print the result. ### Concl
  3. ctx:claims/beam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/91cc0a02-6abc-4cb2-b63f-de88d963ea23
      Show excerpt
      expected_terms = ["happy", "joyful"] precision = evaluate_relevance(expanded_terms, expected_terms) print(f"Precision: {precision}") ``` I'm looking for ways to improve the evaluation strategy to measure the accuracy of the algorithm. Can s
  4. ctx:claims/beam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/c8578409-db7a-4511-babf-7af22c569322
      Show excerpt
      For each combination of weights, evaluate the performance using your test queries and measure the intent precision. ### Example Implementation Here's an example of how you might structure your experiments: ```python import itertools impo

See also

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.