Dontopedia

Separation Question

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-05-06.)

Separation Question has 29 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 10 references, with 1 live disagreement.

29 facts·28 predicates·10 sources·1 in dispute

Mostly:ought not to excite(2), discussed in(1), not thoroughly thought out yet(1)

Maturity scale raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certified

Inbound mentions (23)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

anticipatesFullDiscussionAnticipates Full Discussion(1)

closelyAlliedWithClosely Allied With(1)

concernsConcerns(1)

consideredConsidered(1)

declaredAgainstDeclared Against(1)

declinedToExpressViewsOnDeclined to Express Views on(1)

discussesTopicDiscusses Topic(1)

displaysStaunchnessDisplays Staunchness(1)

emphasizesEmphasizes(1)

evadedReferenceToEvaded Reference to(1)

interviewedOnInterviewed on(1)

lecturedOnLectured on(1)

madeProminentMade Prominent(1)

pledgedToBringForwardPledged to Bring Forward(1)

presupposesSeparationDebatePresupposes Separation Debate(1)

rattedRatted(1)

rattedOnRatted on(1)

shouldHearViewsOnShould Hear Views on(1)

spokeAtLengthOnSpoke at Length on(1)

spokeOnSpoke on(1)

supportsSeparationSupports Separation(1)

tookOpenViewOnTook Open View on(1)

wonAlmostWhollyOnWon Almost Wholly on(1)

Other facts (29)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

29 facts
PredicateValueRef
Ought Not to ExciteAngry Feelings[2]
Ought Not to Exciteangry feelings among public men[2]
Discussed inCooktown[1]
Not Thoroughly Thought Out Yetnull[2]
Only in Infancynull[2]
Occupies Large Proportion of Northern Attentionnull[2]
Concerns Expediency NotLegality of Separation[2]
Should Not Be Decided Only byTreasury Figures Comparisons[2]
Not Burning inCooktown[3]
Is Burning inSome Parts Colony[3]
Was Burning in Some Partstrue[4]
Existential Commitment to Debatetrue[4]
Not Appeared Burning to Premier at Cooktowntrue[4]
Is Tory Burning QuestionSome Parts Colony[3]
Agitated Mind ofCooktown Part[3]
Discussed atImportant Meeting Townsville[5]
References Historical Debate{}[1]
Presupposes North South Divide{}[1]
Presupposed As Contested Issuenull[5]
Topic of MeetingsCharters Towers[3]
Politically Contentious{}[3]
Deontically Requires Govt ActionHer Majestys Inability[4]
Is Living Issue inParliament[6]
Is All Importanttrue[6]
Involves North South Dividenull[6]
Presupposes Partnership BetweenNorth Queensland and South Queensland[7]
Presupposes Ongoing Debatetrue[8]
Relevant to Qldnull[9]
Ongoing DebateQueensland Politics[10]

Timeline

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

discussedIntrove-cooktown/cingalese
ex:cooktown
notThoroughlyThoughtOutYettrove-cooktown/coloured-persons
null
onlyInInfancytrove-cooktown/coloured-persons
null
occupiesLargeProportionOfNorthernAttentiontrove-cooktown/coloured-persons
null
oughtNotToExcitetrove-cooktown/coloured-persons
ex:angry-feelings
oughtNotToExcitetrove-cooktown/coloured-persons
angry feelings among public men
concernsExpediencyNottrove-cooktown/coloured-persons
ex:legality-of-separation
shouldNotBeDecidedOnlyBytrove-cooktown/coloured-persons
ex:treasury-figures-comparisons
notBurningIntrove-cooktown/john-davis
ex:cooktown
isBurningIntrove-cooktown/john-davis
ex:some-parts-colony
wasBurningInSomePartstrove-cooktown/north-shore-cooktown
true
existentialCommitmentToDebatetrove-cooktown/north-shore-cooktown
true
notAppearedBurningToPremierAtCooktowntrove-cooktown/north-shore-cooktown
true
isToryBurningQuestiontrove-cooktown/john-davis
ex:some-parts-colony
agitatedMindOftrove-cooktown/john-davis
ex:cooktown-part
discussedAttrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
ex:important-meeting-townsville
referencesHistoricalDebatetrove-cooktown/cingalese
{}
presupposesNorthSouthDividetrove-cooktown/cingalese
{}
presupposedAsContestedIssuetrove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
null
topicOfMeetingstrove-cooktown/john-davis
ex:charters-towers
politicallyContentioustrove-cooktown/john-davis
{}
deonticallyRequiresGovtActiontrove-cooktown/north-shore-cooktown
ex:her-majestys-inability
isLivingIssueIntrove-cooktown/prostitution
ex:parliament
isAllImportanttrove-cooktown/prostitution
true
involvesNorth-southDividetrove-cooktown/prostitution
null
presupposesPartnershipBetweenbrackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/291086422_Friday-26-December-1890-cooktown-dec-22
ex:north-queensland-and-south-queensland
presupposesOngoingDebatetrove-cooktown/storekeeper-cooktown
true
relevantToQldbrackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/102732220_Saturday-25-July-1885_PICK-UP-NOTES
null
ongoingDebaterosie-reynolds-massacre-connection/trove-peer-carriers-packers-blackboy-native-guide-67948700
ex:queensland-politics

References (10)

10 references
  1. [1]Cingalese3 facts
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/cingalese
  2. ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/coloured-persons
  3. [3]John Davis6 facts
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/john-davis
  4. ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/north-shore-cooktown
  5. [5]Beche De Mer2 facts
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/beche-de-mer
  6. [6]Prostitution3 facts
    ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/prostitution
  7. ctx:genes/brackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/291086422_Friday-26-December-1890-cooktown-dec-22
  8. ctx:genes/trove-cooktown/storekeeper-cooktown
  9. ctx:genes/brackenridge-cairns-1880-1900/trove-new/102732220_Saturday-25-July-1885_PICK-UP-NOTES
  10. ctx:genes/rosie-reynolds-massacre-connection/trove-peer-carriers-packers-blackboy-native-guide-67948700

See also

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.