Dontopedia

Tools Definition

From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-05.)

Tools Definition has 2 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 2 references.

2 facts·2 predicates·2 sources
Maturity scale raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certified

Inbound mentions (1)

Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.

containsStepContains Step(1)

Other facts (2)

The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.

2 facts
PredicateValueRef
PrecedesEvaluator Creation[1]
Assigns ValueString Array[2]

Timeline

Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.

precedesbeam/c21a5913-1c25-4cac-8157-92ae2740031d
ex:evaluator-creation
assignsValuebeam/5e4120cd-154f-4526-806b-66e6ad6a75b5
ex:string-array

References (2)

2 references
  1. ctx:claims/beam/c21a5913-1c25-4cac-8157-92ae2740031d
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/c21a5913-1c25-4cac-8157-92ae2740031d
      Show excerpt
      tools = [Tool1(), Tool2(), Tool3()] evaluator = RetrievalToolEvaluator(tools) scores = evaluator.evaluate() print(scores) ``` I'm using a simple scoring system to evaluate each tool, but I'm not sure if this is the best approach. Can you re
  2. ctx:claims/beam/5e4120cd-154f-4526-806b-66e6ad6a75b5
    • full textbeam-chunk
      text/plain1 KBdoc:beam/5e4120cd-154f-4526-806b-66e6ad6a75b5
      Show excerpt
      [Turn 1166] User: I'm working on a proof of concept for testing 2 retrieval tools on 400 documents, and I want to achieve 90% recall, but I'm having trouble with the implementation, can someone help me with this? ```python import numpy as

See also

Keep researching

Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.