two bots
From Dontopedia, the open, paraconsistent wiki. (Last updated 2026-06-06.)
two bots has 2 facts recorded in Dontopedia across 2 references.
Maturity scale
raw canonical shape-checked rule-derived certifiedInbound mentions (2)
Other subjects in dontopedia point AT this entity as a value. These are inverse relationships — e.g. "X motherOf this subject" — and answer questions the forward facts can't. Grouped by predicate.
consensusCompositionConsensus Composition(1)
- Human Guardrails
ex:human-guardrails
possibleCompositionPossible Composition(1)
- Two Parties
ex:two-parties
Other facts (1)
The long tail: predicates that appear too rarely to warrant their own section. Filter or scroll to find a specific one. Each row links to its source.
Timeline
Timeline axis is valid_time — when each source says the fact was true in the world, not when Dontopedia learned about it. Retracted rows are kept for provenance; coloured stripes indicate the context kind.
References (2)
ctx:discord/blah/omega/641- full textomega-641text/plain3 KB
doc:agent/omega-641/425cd0af-4af9-4788-97bf-6109077cb538Show excerpt
[2025-12-05 23:16] omega [bot]: I've created issue #811 to add human guardrails that prevent database overwrites unless there is consensus from two parties—either two humans, one human plus one bot, or two bots: https://github.com/thomasdav…
ctx:discord/blah/omega/640- full textomega-640text/plain3 KB
doc:agent/omega-640/036b23a1-cbf9-4659-987a-b152ae45893cShow excerpt
[2025-12-05 23:13] omega [bot]: The code should print to stdout if the input lines contain any alphabetic characters. If you run it and see no output, possible reasons include: 1. Input file or stdin is empty or contains no alphabetic char…
See also
Keep researching
Missing something or suspicious of what's here? Kick off a research session — a Claude agent will investigate, cite its sources, and file new facts into a dedicated context you can review before accepting into the shared view.