context
2
ctx:discord/blah/safiersemantics/2Source document
full textsafiersemantics-2
text/plain3 KB
doc:agent/safiersemantics-2/5c89b386-d79c-44f2-9003-8b676c399dd9[2026-01-18 18:25] xenonfun: SS on 0.4.0 now seems to be talking, its still testing things (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_1.24.15_PM.png, Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_1.24.55_PM.png) [2026-01-18 18:28] xenonfun: (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_1.28.40_PM.png) [2026-01-18 18:35] xenonfun: - [ ] make less chatty ```Tool: Sprites.write_stdin Arguments { "data": "\n", "sessionId": "discord-mcp-sprite-a1283a09-42c5-49ed-afc9-c849ee52c2c4" } Response { "status": "success", "session_id": "discord-mcp-sprite-a1283a09-42c5-49ed-afc9-c849ee52c2c4", "bytes_written": 1, "message": "Data written to stdin successfully" }``` vs ``` {"bytes_written": 1} ``` or some error. [2026-01-18 19:19] xenonfun: (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_2.18.53_PM.png) [2026-01-18 19:21] xenonfun: its struggling on 0.5.0 already cut virtual terminal made a mess trying to pull legacy stuff, will have it extract this one into its own library as basis for that logic [2026-01-18 19:55] ajaxdavis: <@187062569415081984> can i use https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/aspnet/web-apps/blazor 😄 [2026-01-18 19:55] ajaxdavis: actually it's a bit over kill [2026-01-18 19:55] ajaxdavis: just anything more than plain html and js [2026-01-18 19:56] ajaxdavis: maybe Razor and HTMX [2026-01-18 19:58] ajaxdavis: (files: Screenshot_2026-01-19_at_5.58.24_AM.png) [2026-01-18 20:27] xenonfun: yeahy blazor is cool, I been meaning since it came out to force myself to use it for UI. its pretty mature at this point, uses the same SignalR backend I'm using now when its in server-only or hybrid mode. [2026-01-18 20:28] xenonfun: Razor + HTMX also perfectly reasonable. just no WASM street cred [2026-01-18 21:13] xenonfun: (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_4.12.26_PM.png) [2026-01-18 21:23] xenonfun: (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_4.23.49_PM.png) [2026-01-18 21:53] xenonfun: well things work again, VirtualTerm in either broken, tho think there are other projects that might already do that function better, I never bothered googling. (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_4.51.56_PM.png) [2026-01-18 21:56] xenonfun: how about we tunnel in a tunnel? (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_4.55.36_PM.png) [2026-01-18 22:12] xenonfun: it works, also crazy how much faster rsync is than scp [2026-01-18 22:13] xenonfun: ``` sent 97000 bytes received 36108k bytes 362G bytes/sec total size is 153M speedup is 4.22 Number of files: 5212 Number of files transferred: 4107 Total file size: 153 MB Total transferred file size: 153 MB Unmatched data: 153 MB Matched data: 0 B File list size: 150 kB Total sent: 97004 B Total received: 36106 kB rsync -avzh --stats -e "ssh -p 2222" sprite@localhost:/home/sprite/ /tmp/junk 0.55s user 1.08s system 30% cpu 5.318 total ``` scp has been going for minute or two, but its solid (files: Screenshot_2026-01-18_at_5.13.42_PM.png)
Facts in this context
Grouped by subject. Each subject links to its full article.
Rsync Log25 factsex:rsync-log
| commandUsed | rsync -avzh --stats -e "ssh -p 2222" sprite@localhost:/home/sprite/ /tmp/junk |
| cpuUsage | 30 |
| destinationPath | /tmp/junk |
| fileListSize | 150 |
| matchedData | 0 |
| numberOfFiles | 5212 |
| numberOfFilesTransferred | 4107 |
| rdf:type | Execution Log |
| receivedBytes | 36108000 |
| remoteHost | localhost |
| remoteUser | sprite |
| reportedTransferRate | 362000000000 |
| sentBytes | 97000 |
| sourcePath | /home/sprite/ |
| speedup | 4.22 |