context
46
ctx:discord/blah/tpmjs/46Source document
full texttpmjs-46
text/plain3 KB
doc:agent/tpmjs-46/3355744f-d2d0-4dee-8fc1-5c7cf8e0c7d5[2026-01-30 15:24] ajaxdavis: (files: Screenshot_2026-01-31_at_1.23.57_AM.png) [2026-01-31 16:19] foxhop.: hunting defects with tpmjs [2026-01-31 16:33] foxhop.: (files: message.txt) [2026-01-31 20:06] foxhop.: https://github.com/tpmjs/tpmjs/pull/17 this didn't use much tokens a draft I didn't review the solution yet. [2026-02-03 03:59] ajaxdavis: https://x.com/pontusab/status/2018376367738696133 [2026-02-03 09:33] foxhop.: (files: Screenshot_from_2026-02-03_04-15-39.png) [2026-02-03 09:33] foxhop.: we had a regression. [2026-02-03 09:35] foxhop.: The issue is upstream of the tool code — it's the sandbox executor service that's returning 502. The executePackage function at packages/package-executor/src/executor.ts:49 POSTs to ${SANDBOX_EXECUTOR_URL}/execute-tool. If that service is down or unreachable, the whole tool call fails before the unsandbox API is ever contacted. What is SANDBOX_EXECUTOR_URL set to in the tpmjs deployment? Is the sandbox executor service running? [2026-02-03 09:52] ajaxdavis: will check it out in 10 [2026-02-03 10:32] ajaxdavis: it's set the to the official executor url by default which is railway [2026-02-03 10:32] ajaxdavis: executor.tpmjs.com [2026-02-03 10:32] ajaxdavis: did you override it with a custom executor yet? [2026-02-03 10:32] foxhop.: hmm [2026-02-03 10:33] foxhop.: no, was that something on my list to do? [2026-02-03 10:33] foxhop.: sorry if I wasted your time [2026-02-03 10:33] ajaxdavis: it's what i was doing last week [2026-02-03 10:33] ajaxdavis: which i will finish doing now, but i think you were fixing something [2026-02-03 10:33] ajaxdavis: but if your collection is just broken... let me see if mine is working [2026-02-03 10:34] foxhop.: I had this one working I have previous chats so that's why it felt like a regression [2026-02-03 10:36] ajaxdavis: yeah mine broken too, sussing itout [2026-02-03 10:46] ajaxdavis: should be back up now [2026-02-03 10:48] ajaxdavis: and im getting a tpmjs executor service deployed on my unsandbox account [2026-02-03 10:48] foxhop.: i saw that [2026-02-03 10:49] foxhop.: was watching logs and saw php hitting it [2026-02-03 10:49] foxhop.: script kiddies looking for entry [2026-02-03 11:01] foxhop.: my agent is working again in tpmjs [2026-02-03 11:05] ajaxdavis: https://klipy.com/gifs/yep-yep [2026-02-03 11:11] foxhop.: if you can get the executor running on itself that is going to be an insane story [2026-02-03 11:17] ajaxdavis: claude says its done lol https://tpmjs.on.unsandbox.com 10% confidence [2026-02-03 11:17] foxhop.: why are we so cool. [2026-02-03 11:18] ajaxdavis: seems to have worked...., let me check logs
Facts in this context
Grouped by subject. Each subject links to its full article.
Foxhop41 factsex:foxhop
| apologizedFor | wasting time |
| askedAboutConfiguration | SANDBOX_EXECUTOR_URL in tpmjs deployment |
| askedAboutServiceStatus | sandbox executor service |
| attachedFile | Screenshot From 2026 02 03 04 15 39.png |
| attachedFile | Message.txt |
| attributedIssueTo | Sandbox Executor Service |
| citedEvidenceOfPriorState | previous chats |
| commentedOnResource | Github Pull 17 |
| confirmedObservation | deployment |
| deniedAction | overriding executor |
| describedActivity | watching logs |
| evaluatedScenarioImpact | insane story |
| explainedPerception | felt like a regression |